Forfaiting, insurance, digital trade documents, and ESG regulations are at the forefront of these developments, each playing a unique role in enhancing the efficiency, security, and sustainability of trade finance operations.

In this special edition of Trade Finance Talks, the Trade Finance Global (TFG) team joined the ITFA Educational Seminar hosted at A&O Shearman in London to speak with a series of trade and forfaiting experts, including: 

• Duarte Pedreira  
• Sam Fowler-Holmes 
• Simon Cook 
• Lorna Pillow 
• Sean Edwards 
• Paul Coles 
• Silja Calac 
• Pouya Jafari 

The goal was to learn more about everything under the vast umbrella topic that is trade finance. Here are a select few of our many key takeaways from the day.

The role and evolution of forfaiting in trade finance

Forfaiting has long been a valuable tool in trade finance, particularly for exporters seeking to discount receivables and mitigate payment risks. The Uniform Rules for Forfaiting (URF 800) have provided a structured framework for these transactions, ensuring clarity and reducing fraud.

Sam Fowler-Holmes, member of the ITFA Emerging Leaders Committee, said, “The purpose of these [ICC rules] is to provide some harmonisation and some industry standards […] in what is a global industry.”

These rules are not automatically applied but must be explicitly stated in agreements, much like the Uniform Customs and Practice for Documentary Credits (UCP). The URF 800 rules govern the sale of receivables rather than their validity, offering a clear delineation of responsibilities and reducing ambiguity between parties.

Forfaiting transactions typically involve the sale of receivables without recourse, meaning the seller receives payment upfront and does not bear the risk of the buyer defaulting. This characteristic makes forfaiting a compelling option for exporters, especially those dealing with buyers in emerging markets. 

Lorna Pillow, Deputy Chairperson and Head of Communication and Membership at ITFA, said, “The very specific characteristics of the techniques – mainly that the payment obligation is abstract from the underlying transaction – are the reason why we continue to look at forfaiting and see the value that it adds when discounting transactions as it also reduces fraud and disputes.”

The evolution of digitalisation has further enhanced the appeal of forfaiting by simplifying the creation, assignment, and transfer of negotiable instruments. As more countries adopt digital trade laws, the potential for streamlined and secure forfaiting transactions grows, reducing the reliance on cumbersome paper-based processes.

The adoption of the URF 800 has also led to the development of complementary frameworks, such as the Uniform Rules for Transferable Electronic Payment Obligations (URTEPO). These rules address the growing need for a legal structure around electronic payment obligations, aligning with the broader trend towards digitalisation in trade finance. 

URTEPO aims to coexist with URF 800, supporting both paper-based and digital transactions by establishing clear guidelines for the sale and transfer of electronic instruments.

Insurance as a key risk mitigation tool in trade finance

Within trade finance, insurance helps protect against political, commercial, and credit risks. Credit insurance, in particular, has become an indispensable tool for banks and other financial institutions, enabling them to extend financing and manage risks more effectively. 

Trade credit insurance offers various forms of coverage, including single-risk non-payment insurance, whole-turnover trade credit insurance, surety protection for guarantee and bond portfolios, and risk participation agreements. These instruments help mitigate risks associated with non-payment, insolvency, and other uncertainties.

Banks leverage credit insurance for more than just risk mitigation; it also helps with capital relief. Regulatory frameworks, such as the European Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR), recognise credit insurance as a valid tool for reducing credit risk and risk-weighted assets. This dual benefit of risk mitigation and capital relief makes credit insurance an attractive option for banks looking to optimise their balance sheets and extend their capacity to finance trade transactions.

Silja Calac, Head of Advocacy Group and Head of Treasury at ITFA, said, “Why do banks like to use insurance? Insurance is silent. Nobody knows that a bank has this insurance except the bank and the insurer, which can make the bank look like it has more capacity. For instance, in a syndicated facility, a bank may need a minimum amount of capacity on its own balance sheet to be a lead arranger. If it doesn’t have this, it can use insurance to increase its capacity to fill the role.”

Despite its advantages, the credit insurance industry faces challenges, particularly with regulatory changes. For example, the introduction of Basel IV regulations requires a reassessment of the loss-given default (LGD) for insured transactions. 

The current LGD—set at 45% for insurance cover—poses a challenge, as it does not adequately reflect insurance policyholders’ preferred lender status. Ongoing advocacy efforts aim to address this issue, seeking more favourable treatment for insurance in the regulatory framework.

Digital transformation in trade finance: trends and standards

The digital transformation of trade finance is revolutionising the industry, driven by technological advancements and legal frameworks supporting electronic trade documents. Traditional trade finance has long relied on physical paper documents, which are cumbersome and prone to delays and errors. 

The United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL) Model Law on Electronic Transferable Records (MLETR) has been a significant catalyst in this transformation. By providing a legal blueprint for electronic trade documents, MLETR has paved the way for countries to enact legislation supporting the use of digital instruments. 

To date, 11 jurisdictions – including Singapore, Abu Dhabi Global Markets, the UK, and France – have adopted MLETR-aligned digital trade legislation.

Digital standards play a crucial role in ensuring the interoperability and scalability of electronic trade solutions. 

Pouya Jafari, Chair, ITFA Emerging Leaders, said, “The International Chamber of Commerce (ICC) Digital Standards Initiative (DSI) has made significant strides in this area, publishing data standards and recommendations for common trade documents.” 

Simon Cook, Head of Education at ITFA, said, “One of the benefits of structured trade transactions is the ability to deal with the various risks inherent in transactions, allowing borrowers to get better pricing, funders to have a better risk profile and hopefully get some capital relief.”

Fintech platforms are also instrumental in driving the digital transformation of trade finance. They offer solutions that enhance customer experience, improve operational efficiency, and ensure compliance with regulatory requirements. 

For example, supply chain finance platforms enable corporates to access financing from multiple sources, while optical character recognition (OCR) technology automates the processing of trade documents. By partnering with fintech providers, traditional financial institutions can leverage these technologies to streamline their operations and expand their offerings.

The emergence of new methods to distribute trade finance assets in the secondary market is another exciting development brought about by digitalisation. As more banks pursue originate-to-distribute strategies, fintech platforms can help connect them with institutional investors and other non-bank lenders. This secondary market expansion enhances liquidity and enables banks to manage their trade finance portfolios more effectively.

Jafari added, “The real transformation in trade finance will be quite gradual. It’s already happening, but I think we’ll need to spend the next few years focusing on the adoption of existing technologies.”

The growing influence of ESG regulations on trade finance

Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) regulations are increasingly shaping the practices of financial institutions, with significant implications for trade finance. The focus on sustainability and ethical business practices is driving the adoption of ESG principles across the industry, influencing both financing decisions and risk management strategies.

ESG regulation is highly dynamic, with the European Union leading the way in implementing comprehensive frameworks. The EU’s taxonomy for sustainable activities, along with directives aimed at promoting corporate sustainability, underscores the importance of ESG considerations in financial services. These regulations mandate transparency and encourage financial institutions to align their portfolios with sustainable development goals.

Sean Edwards, Chairman of ITFA, said, “For trade finance, the emphasis on ESG is particularly relevant in the context of supply chain finance. Supply chains are major contributors to global carbon emissions, and financing sustainable supply chains is a critical component of corporate sustainability strategies.” 

ESG-linked supply chain finance solutions incentivise suppliers to adopt sustainable practices, thereby reducing environmental impact and enhancing social and governance standards.

Integrating ESG principles into trade finance also presents challenges, particularly in terms of measuring and reporting ESG performance. Greenwashing – where companies falsely claim to adhere to ESG standards – is a significant concern. Regulatory scrutiny and the development of robust reporting frameworks can help combat greenwashing practices and ensure the credibility of ESG initiatives.

Despite these challenges, the focus on ESG presents significant opportunities for innovation and growth in trade finance. Financial institutions that effectively integrate ESG considerations into their operations can enhance their reputation, attract socially conscious investors, and contribute to sustainable development. 

—

Trade finance is changing. The evolution of forfaiting, the critical role of insurance, digital transformation, and the growing influence of ESG regulations are reshaping how the industry operates.

As it adapts to these changes, the future of trade finance looks promising, with innovative solutions and practices paving the way for a more resilient and sustainable global trade ecosystem.