Carter Hoffman

Carter is a Research Associate at Trade Finance Global focusing on the impact of macroeconomic trends and emerging technologies on international trade. He holds international business and science degrees from the European Business School in Germany as well as Brock University and Queen’s University in Canada where he served as the director of operations and finance for the student executive council and as an operations associate for the Queen’s University Alternative Asset Fund. Carter’s work has been featured in publications and articles supported by the SME Finance Forum, managed by the International Finance Corporation, World Trade Organization, and International Chamber of Commerce.

Latest Post

Download our 2020 Guide

Blockchain and DLT in trade: Where do we stand?

Download

Download our 2019 Guide

Blockchain and DLT in trade: A reality check

Download

Contents

Self-sovereign identity

According to the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEE), SSI is a concept where the user – and only the user – has full control over their identity data. 

This is in contrast with the world of today where identity is managed by a cluttered collection of centralised independent bodies. 

Currently, an individual may be called upon to display a driver’s licence, passport, or identity card as proof of identity. However, the extent to which this identity is trusted is directly linked to the level of trust that can be placed in the central authority that issued the identification.

My Ripley’s Aquarium membership card, for example, is unlikely to be trusted enough as an identity document to secure me a line of credit at the bank, but my Canadian passport would be.

While this farcical example is unlikely to play out in reality, there are many much more realistic examples of an identity authority not being trusted. 

The Chinese government, for example, does not recognise identity documents issued by Taiwan in much the same way that the bank doesn’t recognise my aquarium card. To conduct business on the content then, a Taiwanese trader would need to register with an identity authority that is recognised there.

Or what about a rural Columbian coffee farmer whose only piece of identification comes from the local community government – will this be recognised if the farmer tries to acquire a bit of financing to export the latest harvest?  

Decentralised identifiers (DIDs) can be used to enable SSIs. 

The W3C working draft on the topic states that “Decentralised identifiers (DIDs) are a new type of identifier that enables verifiable, decentralised digital identity. 

“A DID identifies any subject (e.g., a person, organisation, thing, data model, abstract entity, etc.) that the controller of the DID decides that it identifies”.

By making creative use of blockchain technology, DIDs are able to circumvent the types of issues faced by that Columbian farmer by creating a verifiable identity in a decentralised manner. 

This enables the owner of the data to control their own data while still making it verifiable, and also solves some of the data protection concerns raised by regulations like the EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) of 2018.